L.A. Times article on “Breaking Dawn”

by on December 4, 2008
in Books, Movie

6 Comments
Tweet This - Add to Facebook
Share Post

The L.A. Times has an article up on the 10 reasons why “Breaking Dawn” should not be made into a movie. Go here to read the article and see the reasons the list why they think the book should not be made into a movie.


Comments

6 Responses
  1. Alice Rocks says:

    The person who wrote this article is very crude and should retract it! Breaking Dawn will be a great movie and so will all the others. If your a hard core fan youll appreciate the effort it takes to convert a book into a movie. And the reasons given are just stupid! They are all abolut how the writer dies not like the book and has nothing to do with the movie it will be. All I have to say is…..What A Jerk!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  2. Twilight Obsessed says:

    This is really stupid…it is a fantasy world and they should take that into consideration…and all that about teenagers getting married is stupid. Bella is 18 and an adult…so I don’t see why it matters. I also agree with Alice Rocks about if you’re a hard core fan you should appreciate it. So as far as making the movie goes…IT SHOULD BE MADE!

  3. Elle Tae says:

    I`m agree with Alice and T.Obsessed, this is just SO STUPID, since the trama is not very aproppiate to the childs, all the people who can see the movie at the cinema are only adults and teenagers, so what is the problem with make breaking dawn movie, i mean…ok they can censure some scenes but there are a lot of movies with blood, sex, and more stuffs, i´m angry, i hope summit entertainment and stephenie make the movie. I don´t see any bad in the book, i love the saga.

  4. Frawgymama says:

    Seriously, this book HAS to be made into a movie!!!!! It’s like the pinacle of the series, it’s what all the fans hve been waiting for!!!! Actually more so because I don’t think we were thinking that Bella would end up pregnant but that just made for a better story line. With how Bella is portrayed in the book and because she is only 19 I’m not surprised that she wasn’t more “graphic” about her’s and Edward’s lovemaking. Bella is a reserved person, so what did that idiot expect, has she not read the other three books!!!!!! I’m sure most fans were hoping for a little more, only because they’ve fallen in love with the idea of Edward themselves and want to “experience” what it would be like to make love to him, but this is the way Stephenie chose to write it. You need to remember there are younger girls reading this series as well that don’t need to be reading all the graphicness of lovemaking. It was a great book and I’m sure it will make a great movie!!!

  5. Frawgymama says:

    Sorry I meant to say 18, I was thinking she was almost 19 and typed that in on accident:)

  6. C0w says:

    I AGREE WITH THIS ARTICLE
    DONT GET ME WRONG I LOVED THE BOOKS UNTIL BD CAME OUT- IT WAS A COMPLETE FAILURE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    IT SUCKED SO THE MOVIE WILL SUCK TOO

Share Your Thoughts

Personalize your comments with a Gravatar.